litespeed or apache with mod lsapi
Forum
  1. Forums
  2. General
  3. General Discussion
  1. Hostking
  2. Tuesday, 29 November 2016
  3.  Subscribe via email
Hi guys

Just like to know what you recommend. Currently I notice some customers sites not fully protected using mod security rules using comodo and litespeed compared to when we used apache mpm worker and mod lsapi.

Now before I go ahead I\'d like to see what you guys recommend as I still see a lot of hosts offering litespeed.

What do you use or think. We have SSD servers and fast ones with plenty of memory so wondering if I should just increase memory on servers and just go back to good ol apache instead of litespeed. Is it that much faster as in noticeable difference.
Rate this post:
  1. 29.11.2016 15:11:55
  2. # 1
Bogdan Accepted Answer
Posts: 709
Joined: 26.06.2013
0
Votes
Undo
Hi,

We at CloudLinux, are sure native LiteSpeed is faster than apache with lsphp (and more memory on board). Not sure what you mean with \'sites not fully protected\', could you please clarify?
  1. 02.12.2016 01:12:28
  2. # 2
Hostking Accepted Answer
Posts: 38
Joined: 07.11.2012
0
Votes
Undo
Some Modsecurity rules don\'t work. which is a major issue for shared hosts. Works fine with apache but not with litespeed. They are working on it though but then every few months someone if not us or some other client finds mod security rules not compatible with litespeed.

Hope fully it will all come right soon.
  • Page :
  • 1


There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!
Guest
Submit Your Response
Upload files or images for this discussion by clicking on the upload button below. Supports gif,jpg,png,zip,rar,pdf
• Insert • Remove Upload Files (Maximum File Size: 2 MB)
Captcha
To protect the site from bots and unauthorized scripts, we require that you enter the captcha codes below before posting your question.